Migration washington

Washington state population Year Natural Increase Net Migration 26, 83, 28, 90, 30, 86, 33, 93, 35, 87, 35, 57, 36, 49, 36, 28, 37, 11, 37, 5, 40, 11, 41, 22, 41, 41, 41, 63, 37, 83, 36, 54, 34, 46, 34, 32, 34, 54, 36, 39, 36, 65, Related Maps Population change is comprised of two major components -- natural increase and net migration. Natural increase births minus deaths is the more stable component of population change. Natural increase hit a nadir in when the number of births in the state fell to its lowest level in the post WWII era, a period commonly referred to as the "Baby Bust.

This high level of births, referred to by demographers as the "Third Wave" of the baby boom, was expected to hold for some time. Beginning in , women started having fewer children in response to the recession and the slow pace of the economic recovery. In , persons age 65 and over made up approximately The increase of population aged 65 and older means a smaller share of the population will be women of child bearing age.

As large-scale logging operations were leaving Southern Appalachia, many people followed them out to the Pacific Northwest. As resources became depleted in WNC and the Great Depression limited the workforce, many people sought better employment opportunity elsewhere.

World War Two also spurred inward migration. Most emigrants would switch profession when they moved. The Tarheels in Washington were an exception.

CAFTA also gave a boost to the maquiladora or export-processing businesses, lending an all-too-generous hand to textile, garment, pharmaceutical, electronics, and other industries that regularly scour the globe for the cheapest places to manufacture their goods.

In the process, it created mainly the kind of low-quality jobs that corporations can easily move anytime in an ongoing global race to the bottom. Central American social movements have also vehemently protested CAFTA provisions that undermine local regulations and social protections, while privileging foreign corporations. Another severe restriction that prevents Central American governments from pursuing economic policies in the interest of their populations is government debt.

Private banks lavished loans on dictatorial governments in the s, then pumped up interest rates in the s, causing those debts to balloon. The International Monetary Fund stepped in to bail out the banks, imposing debt restructuring programs on already-impoverished countries — in other words, making the poor pay for the profligacy of the wealthy. For real economic development, governments need the resources to fund health, education, and welfare. A debt jubilee would be a crucial step towards restructuring the global economy and shifting the stream of global resources that currently flows so strongly from the poorest to the richest countries.

Now, add another disastrous factor to this equation: the U. The focus of the drug war on Mexico in the early s spurred an orgy of gang violence there, while pushing the trade south into Central America. The results have been disastrous. As drug traffickers moved in, they brought violence, land grabs, and capital for new cattle and palm-oil industries, drawing in corrupt politicians and investors.

Pouring arms and aid into the drug wars that have exploded in Central America has only made trafficking even more corrupt, violent, and profitable. While the news largely tends to present ongoing drought, punctuated by ever more frequent and violent hurricanes and tropical storms, as well as increasingly disastrous flooding, as so many individual occurrences, their heightened frequency is certainly a result of climate change.

Climate change is, in fact, just what the U. The United States has, of course, played and continues to play an outsized role in contributing to climate change. And, in fact, we continue to emit far more CO2 per person than any other large country. But the story is more complicated than the slogan. The Great Migration was largely from the rural South while the new migration has little to do with rural areas, or with states like Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana which saw so many leave during the exodus.

The big cities of Georgia, Florida, Virginia, Texas, and North Carolina have attracted most of those participating in the Move South and typically this has not been a return migration. Some elders have returned home, but a strong majority are newcomers to the South, including many children or grandchildren of the exodus generation.

Others are immigrants from the Caribbean and Africa. And the migration is transforming the South. Many of the migrants have come with advanced skills and education: some with resources to start new enterprises, others with the capacity to affect the culture and politics of southern places. Here are interactive graphics and maps that allow us to track the migration south. The relocations of African Americans have been among the most consequential migrations in American history.